1971 Jensen FF vs. 2010 Ford Flex

To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Ford Flex. (262 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Flex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 53 kg more than 1971 Jensen FF.

Let's talk about torque, 1971 Jensen FF (587 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Flex. (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1971 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Flex.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Jensen FF 2010 Ford Flex
Make Jensen Ford
Model FF Flex
Year Released 1971 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6276 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 279 HP 262 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 587 Nm 336 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1975 kg 2028 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 5126 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1928 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1727 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2995 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]