1971 Lancia 2000 vs. 1942 Packard 12

To start off, 1971 Lancia 2000 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,301 cc (12 cylinders), 1942 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Packard 12 weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1971 Lancia 2000.

Because 1942 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Lancia 2000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Lancia 2000 1942 Packard 12
Make Lancia Packard
Model 2000 12
Year Released 1971 1942
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 7301 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 117 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1235 kg 2450 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 5800 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 3440 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]