1971 Lotus Elan vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan.
Because 1971 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Lotus Elan | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Lotus | Zastava |
| Model | Elan | 102 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1115 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1340 mm |
