1971 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2003 Nissan Murano is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1971 Lotus Elan. (126 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1971 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Murano weights approximately 930 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Murano (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Lotus Elan. (153 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Lotus Elan | 2003 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Murano |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 82 L |