1971 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2003 Seat Toledo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Lotus Elan (126 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Seat Toledo. (104 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Toledo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Toledo weights approximately 350 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan.
Because 1971 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Lotus Elan (153 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Toledo. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1971 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Lotus Elan | 2003 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Elan | Toledo |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |