1971 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1971 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1971 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 866 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Lotus Elan | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Elan | S60 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |