1971 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2010 Fiat Siena is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Lotus Elan (126 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Siena. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Siena weights approximately 225 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan.
Because 1971 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Lotus Elan (153 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Siena. (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1971 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Lotus Elan | 2010 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Lotus | Fiat |
Model | Elan | Siena |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 86.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 67.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 47 L |