1971 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 665 kg more than 1971 Matra-Simca M530.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1971 Matra-Simca M530 has manual transmission. 1971 Matra-Simca M530 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Matra-Simca M530 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
Model | M530 | Sentia |
Year Released | 1971 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2860 mm |