1971 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 439 more horse power than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 715 kg more than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Matra-Simca M530 (128 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1971 Matra-Simca M530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Matra-Simca M530 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
Model | M530 | Helem |
Year Released | 1971 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |