1971 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1971 Matra-Simca M530.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Matra-Simca M530 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Holden |
Model | M530 | UTE |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |