1971 Mazda 1000 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda 1000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 225 kg more than 1971 Mazda 1000.
Because 1971 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda 1000 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 1000 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1998 |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2770 mm |
