1971 Mazda 1000 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,149 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 275 kg more than 1971 Mazda 1000.
Because 1971 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda 1000 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 1000 | Clio |
Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2480 mm |