1971 Mazda 110 S vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1971 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 660 kg more than 1971 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda 110 S | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 110 S | CTS |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2597 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2890 mm |