1971 Mazda 110 S vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 130 kg more than 1971 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda 110 S | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 110 S | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2480 mm |
