1971 Mazda 110 S vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1971 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 255 kg more than 1971 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda 110 S | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 110 S | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |
