1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1974 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1974 Toyota Celica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1974 Toyota Celica. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1974 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Toyota Celica weights approximately 30 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Toyota Celica (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1974 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 1974 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Celica |
Year Released | 1971 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1588 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |