1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Clio |
Year Released | 1971 | 1990 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1870 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |