1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 140 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Cosmo | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1971 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |