1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2005 Skoda Fabia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Skoda Fabia (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 230 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Skoda Fabia. (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | Cosmo | Fabia |
Year Released | 1971 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |