1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 615 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (189 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Mazda | Chrysler |
Model | Cosmo | Sebring |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 189 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2750 mm |