1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Proton Arena
To start off, 2010 Proton Arena is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Proton Arena. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Arena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Proton Arena weights approximately 95 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Proton Arena | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | Cosmo | Arena |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1468 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |
