1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Buick Enclave
To start off, 2011 Buick Enclave is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Buick Enclave is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Buick Enclave (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Buick Enclave should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Buick Enclave weights approximately 1228 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Buick Enclave (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Buick Enclave will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Buick Enclave | |
Make | Mazda | Buick |
Model | Cosmo | Enclave |
Year Released | 1971 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2168 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2007 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3020 mm |