1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 905 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Cosmo | Captiva |
Year Released | 1971 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1990 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |