1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 559 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda Cosmo | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Cosmo | 6 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3726 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2790 mm |