1971 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda RX-2 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-2 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |
