1971 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1980 Toyota Cressida is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Cressida. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 300 kg more than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Cressida. (132 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda RX-2 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-2 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1971 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2650 mm |