1971 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2009 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Volvo S80 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S80 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2009 Volvo S80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S80 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda RX-2 | 2009 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-2 | S80 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |