1971 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1971 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mazda RX-2 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | RX-2 | Epica |
Year Released | 1971 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |