1971 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2010 Holden Epica

To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL (168 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.

Because 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Mercedes-Benz SL 2010 Holden Epica
Make Mercedes-Benz Holden
Model SL Epica
Year Released 1971 2010
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2778 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 148 HP
Torque 240 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2700 mm