1971 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1971 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 75 kg more than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1971 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2400 mm |