1971 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 465 kg more than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Colt | C-Max |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2648 mm |