1971 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1971 Nissan Cedric. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1971 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 525 kg more than 1971 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Nissan Cedric. (145 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
Model | Cedric | XF |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2908 mm |