1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1972 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1972 Volvo 1800 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 115 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Because 1972 Volvo 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 1800. (176 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 NSU Ro 80 | 1972 Volvo 1800 | |
| Make | NSU | Volvo |
| Model | Ro 80 | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2460 mm |
