1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1971 NSU Ro 80 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | NSU | Volvo |
Model | Ro 80 | 240 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2660 mm |