1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1971 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 370 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.

Compare all specifications:

1971 NSU Ro 80 2002 Acura CL
Make NSU Acura
Model Ro 80 CL
Year Released 1971 2002
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1990 cc 3210 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary V
Horse Power 115 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 315 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1210 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 65 L