1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 NSU Ro 80 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | NSU | Toyota |
| Model | Ro 80 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |
