1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1971 NSU Ro 80 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | NSU | Holden |
Model | Ro 80 | Epica |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |