1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 NSU Ro 80 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | NSU | Renault |
| Model | Ro 80 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |
