1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (381 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
Model | Cutlass | Titan |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5736 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3560 mm |