1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2010 Renault Koleos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Koleos weights approximately 40 kg more than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Cutlass | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5736 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2690 mm |
