1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 38 kg more than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 81 L |
