1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Suzuki Aerio
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Aerio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 943 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Aerio.
Because 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Aerio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Suzuki Aerio | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Suzuki |
Model | Silver Shadow | Aerio |
Year Released | 1971 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1207 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 50 L |