1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2006 Ford Galaxy
To start off, 2006 Ford Galaxy is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 467 kg more than 2006 Ford Galaxy.
Because 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2006 Ford Galaxy | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Galaxy |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1683 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 70 L |
