1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2006 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Korando is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 285 kg more than 2006 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2006 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2006 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | SsangYong |
Model | Silver Shadow | Korando |
Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 70 L |