1971 Rover 2000 vs. 2005 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Toyota MR2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota MR2 (138 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rover 2000 weights approximately 299 kg more than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Rover 2000 (172 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 1971 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Rover 2000 | 2005 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2500 mm |