1971 Rover 2000 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Rover 2000 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 2000 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
