1971 Rover 2000 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Rover 2000 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 2000 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
