1971 Rover 2000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Rover 2000 (106 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1971 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (190 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Rover 2000 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 190 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2525 mm |