1971 Rover P5B vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1971 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 208 kg more than 1971 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover P5B. (296 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover P5B.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Rover P5B 2009 Cadillac CTS
Make Rover Cadillac
Model P5B CTS
Year Released 1971 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Size 3528 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 158 HP 307 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 374 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2820 mm 2890 mm