1971 Seat 1500 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1971 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1971 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 560 kg more than 1971 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Seat 1500 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1500 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3270 mm |
